newNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
In late July, the House of Representatives passed legislation within hours that was intended to “codify the findings of Obergefell v. Hodges and the 2015 redefinition of marriage”.
Rather than defend the institution of marriage, many Republicans chose to run for the hills – calling the move a political stunt, opting to criticize the legislative process rather than merely defend the absence of regular order or a basic natural truth. .
Worse, Senate Republicans seem even more inclined to capitulate ahead of the election, when a handful of Republican senators announced their support for redefining marriage. Now a window-dressing compromise amendment that states only that people of faith have religious freedom and conscience protections in the Constitution threatens to provide the 60 votes needed for federal legislation to pass.
Simply reiterating what already exists will neither stop the radical left from dragging good people through the court system nor ruffling and feathering the public for those in the media who owe their allegiance only to God. Living life
US bishops to chastise ‘reasonable and honest’ religious opponents of gay marriage bill
It’s bad enough that five members of the Supreme Court erroneously claimed that the US Constitution requires a new definition of marriage, but if the Senate votes to codify this redefinition of marriage, it will only serve to oppress. Will work to add fuel to the fire of those who punish and punish. Citizens and organizations that keep the truth about marriage.
The Senate bill pays lip service to the rights of religious freedom and conscience, but it provides no meaningful protections for those rights. If the senate’s sponsors had wanted, they could have explicitly stated that no person or organization could be punished by the government for acting in accordance with the firm belief that marriage unites husband and wife—special The IRS cannot formally strip any such organization of its non-profit status.
But the Bill does not provide any such protection. It is not a compromise, not even a bad compromise. It sets up a false definition of marriage in our law and then tells people that if and when they are prosecuted they can have their day in court. It is not public policy for the common good.
Utah Sen. Mike Lee warns religious freedom protections in gay marriage bill ‘seriously bloodthirsty’
Republican senators must stand strong and defend what is right and good. Marriage is a natural and supernatural institution before it is a political institution. Human law must reflect natural law and eternal law. No senator should vote to allow the government to redefine marriage.
Marriage serves as a cultural momentum car that determines and reflects the health of American society and culture at large. The future of this country depends on the future of marriage.
Marriage is a natural institution that predates government. It is based on the anthropological truth that men and women are distinct and complementary. It is based on a biological fact that both male and female are needed for reproduction. And it is based on a social reality that children deserve both a mother and a father. Or, as Pope Francis once said, that children have a right to a mother and a father. Marriage increases the likelihood that a man will commit to both the children he helps produce and their mothers.
Click here to receive the Opinion newsletter
Because it is so important to our society and especially to its most vulnerable members, marriage is not something that can be legislated in one day without consequences. In the seven years since the Supreme Court short-circuited a national conversation on marriage, American culture has changed at an alarming pace; It would be virtually unrecognizable even to recent generations.
Despite constant insistence by members of Congress and unelected judges, the truth of millennials cannot be easily dismissed or redefined to fit socially pressurized activist ideas of the day.
The law cannot be neutral on marriage. It can either confirm truth or promote distortions.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The fundamental truth will always remain – marriage is between one man and one woman. No act of Congress can change this, although it may make it harder for citizens to understand and embrace the truth. Worse, it allows the government to punish citizens and organizations that acknowledge the truth. Which is why it is so outrageous that the Bill does not include any explicit safeguards for such citizens.
It is the moral duty of those who see and know the truth to stand firm in its defense and protect the institution of marriage. It takes courage to do so in the face of fear and the cultural and political pressure to compromise; The question is how many Republicans will vote on this bill when it comes to the floor.
Click here to read more from the representative. chip roy
Ryan T. Anderson is president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of several books, including “What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense.”